Period: June 2024 - ongoing
The proposed research, titled “Comparative Analysis of the Willingness to Pay (WTP) Techniques: Predicting Sanitation Behaviors of Users (Landlords and Tenants) by Comparing WTP Techniques for Sanitation Services in Urban Slums, Dhaka, Bangladesh”, seeks to address a critical gap in our understanding of user preferences and payment behaviors in the context of urban sanitation in low-income settings. Access to improved sanitation remains a persistent challenge in the densely populated urban slums of Dhaka, where infrastructural limitations, economic constraints, and complex landlord-tenant dynamics hinder sustainable service delivery. While previous studies have used various economic valuation techniques to estimate the willingness to pay for sanitation services, there is still limited evidence on how accurately these methods predict real-world behaviors and preferences, especially in complex and diverse urban slum settings.
This research aims to revisit and compare the effectiveness of three widely used WTP techniques—Discrete Choice Experiments (DCE), Contingent Valuation (CV), and Hedonic Pricing (HP)—in capturing and predicting the actual sanitation investment behaviors of two key user groups: landlords and tenants. Each of these techniques carries distinct strengths and limitations. For instance, CV methods are susceptible to hypothetical bias, DCE may oversimplify complex decision-making environments, and HP relies on the availability of adequate market data. By comparing the outcomes of these techniques within the same study context, this research will provide deeper insights into their relative predictive power and practical relevance.
To conduct this study, primary data will be collected in 2024 from five selected slum areas in Dhaka where earlier WTP data had been collected in 2019 under the Dhaka Sanitation Improvement Project (DSIP). This approach allows for a longitudinal comparison, capturing changes over time in users’ preferences, behaviors, and willingness to invest in sanitation services. The sample will include both tenants and landlords to account for the differences in decision-making authority, investment motivations, and access to sanitation services. Updated survey instruments will be used to reflect contextual changes, and statistical models—particularly mixed logit models—will be employed to analyze preferences and estimate WTP across different socio-economic segments.
In addition to comparing methodologies, the study will also explore the socio-cultural, economic, and behavioral factors that influence sanitation choices and financial commitments among urban poor households. Special attention will be given to tenure security, affordability, perceived benefits, and infrastructure availability. By identifying how these variables interact with WTP, the study aims to generate actionable insights that can inform the design of equitable and financially sustainable urban sanitation programs.
Ultimately, this research seeks to contribute to evidence-based policy and programming by recommending the most contextually appropriate WTP technique for predicting sanitation behavior in low-income urban settings. The findings will be relevant not only for Dhaka but also for other cities facing similar challenges, offering scalable lessons for improving access to safely managed sanitation and advancing progress toward Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6.


